英國(guó)環(huán)保水平處于歐洲末流的英語(yǔ)美文
Britain Gets Bad Mark in Pollution Ratings
在倡導(dǎo)“綠色”和環(huán)境保護(hù)的歐洲，英國(guó)人一定沒(méi)有想到自己的國(guó)家在環(huán)保方面卻是一個(gè)“矮子”。
Britain has one of the worst environmental records in Europe.
在倡導(dǎo)“綠色”和環(huán)境保護(hù)的歐洲，英國(guó)人一定沒(méi)有想到自己的國(guó)家在環(huán)保方面卻是一個(gè)“矮子”。根據(jù)美國(guó)耶魯大學(xué)和哥倫比亞大學(xué)研究人員共同撰寫(xiě)的《2005年環(huán)境可持續(xù)發(fā)展指數(shù)報(bào)告》，在146個(gè)上榜國(guó)家中，英國(guó)位列第66位。這樣的排名比大多數(shù)北歐國(guó)家、美國(guó)(第45位)甚至許多前蘇聯(lián)加盟共和國(guó)的排名都要低。
據(jù)英國(guó)《衛(wèi)報(bào)》1月25日?qǐng)?bào)道，這份將要在1月27日達(dá)沃斯世界經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇上發(fā)表的報(bào)告，其目的在于通過(guò)對(duì)各國(guó)在諸如大氣污染治理、生物多樣性和環(huán)保國(guó)際協(xié)作等方面的.研究和分析，對(duì)各國(guó)在未來(lái)幾十年里環(huán)保方面的能力做出一個(gè)準(zhǔn)確判斷。根據(jù)這份報(bào)告，芬蘭得分75.1，高居各國(guó)之首，而英國(guó)只有50.2分，排在第66位。
但從排名上看，英國(guó)比2002年時(shí)的第91位排名上升了不少，但該報(bào)告的作者在解釋其中的原因時(shí)表示，這并不是說(shuō)英國(guó)人在改善環(huán)保方面做出了什么突出的貢獻(xiàn)，而是因?yàn)樾聢?bào)告在一些標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的采用方面作了一些修改。
根據(jù)這份環(huán)境可持續(xù)發(fā)展報(bào)告，在22個(gè)歐盟國(guó)家里，英國(guó)的環(huán)保排名在第16位，也就是說(shuō)英國(guó)在環(huán)保方面比起斯堪的納維亞半島國(guó)家、德國(guó)、法國(guó)和前蘇聯(lián)的一些加盟共和國(guó)，比如拉脫維亞、立陶宛和愛(ài)沙尼亞來(lái)說(shuō)，做得遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠�？梢哉f(shuō)，在歐盟大家庭中，英國(guó)人的環(huán)保紀(jì)錄應(yīng)該是最末流的。根據(jù)上述報(bào)告，在環(huán)保方面做得最出色國(guó)家應(yīng)該是北歐的芬蘭，世界上沒(méi)有任何一個(gè)國(guó)家在環(huán)保方面能夠超過(guò)芬蘭的成就。而在歐洲國(guó)家里，環(huán)境保護(hù)工作最不得力的國(guó)家則是比利時(shí)。
耶魯大學(xué)環(huán)境法規(guī)政策中心主任、本書(shū)作者之一的丹尼爾·埃斯蒂認(rèn)為：“英國(guó)在環(huán)保方面最薄弱的環(huán)節(jié)就是土地的退化。此外，英國(guó)在減少大氣污染方面做得也很不夠。倫敦和許多其它英國(guó)城市在治理大氣污染方面都存在很多問(wèn)題。雖然巴黎和羅馬的大氣污染要比倫敦嚴(yán)重得多，但是同美國(guó)的洛杉磯或者是休斯敦相比，倫敦的大氣污染實(shí)在是太嚴(yán)重了�！�
報(bào)告還顯示，英國(guó)人在促進(jìn)他國(guó)減少污染方面也比較落后。比如英國(guó)至今仍然是海外鋼鐵和汽車(chē)業(yè)的消費(fèi)大戶(hù)，而這些行業(yè)在任何一個(gè)國(guó)家都是污染大戶(hù)。埃斯蒂教授表示：“雖然這些污染嚴(yán)重的工業(yè)已經(jīng)移出了英國(guó)，一些經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家甚至將這樣的舉止稱(chēng)為一個(gè)成就，但從全球環(huán)保角度來(lái)看，這個(gè)問(wèn)題顯然一點(diǎn)也不樂(lè)觀�！�
對(duì)于這份即將正式出臺(tái)的報(bào)告，英國(guó)環(huán)境、食品和農(nóng)業(yè)事務(wù)部的一位發(fā)言人進(jìn)行了反駁。他說(shuō)：“英國(guó)在可持續(xù)發(fā)展方面一直有著良好的信譽(yù)。在改善生活用水方面，英國(guó)也逐年取得進(jìn)步�！�
對(duì)于美國(guó)環(huán)保方面的問(wèn)題，報(bào)告作者之一的埃斯蒂教授認(rèn)為，美國(guó)在環(huán)保方面比美國(guó)人自己想象的要差，但要比大多數(shù)歐洲人認(rèn)為的要好。他說(shuō)：“美國(guó)的環(huán)保發(fā)展很不平衡。美國(guó)的水質(zhì)在世界上是一流的，但在溫室氣體排放方面，美國(guó)則處在世界末流地位�！�
Britain has one of the worst environmental records in Europe, according to a new index ranking countries on their performance on green issues which will be unveiled at the World Economic Forum in Davos this week.
The 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI), obtained by the Guardian ahead of Thursday"s publication, was compiled by researchers at Yale and Columbia universities using 21 broad indicators covering pollution levels, policy and vulnerability to environmental damage. The aim, their report says, was to gauge each nation"s ability "to protect the environment over the next several decades".
By that measure, Britain is in a lowly state. It ranks 66th out of the 146 countries on the index, considerably behind most of northern Europe, the US (ranked 45th), and even most of the former Soviet Union.
The result is at least a marked improvement on the last index in 2002, when Britain was ranked 91st, but the ESI"s authors say that the rise up the table is a reflection of a refinement in the criteria used more than real environmental improvements. The country remains near the bottom of the league in Europe.
Britain ranked 16th out of the 22 European Union countries in the study, significantly worse than Scandinavia, Germany, France and the former Soviet Baltic republics, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia. Finland came top in Europe and the world. Belgium came last in Europe while North Korea was judged to be worst in the world.
"In the UK, the weakest element is land degradation. There is a high percentage of British land that has been messed with through 1,000 years of history," said Daniel Esty, director of the Yale centre for environmental law and policy and one of the report"s authors. "Britain also lags badly when it comes to reducing air pollution. London and other cities have a serious air pollution problem.
Britain also scored poorly for exporting environmental pressures abroad, continuing to consume the output of polluting industries, like steel and cars, which have moved overseas. "The dirty business is being done elsewhere," Prof Esty said. "Economists will celebrate this as comparable advantage, but it looks differently from an environmental point of view."
However, the main reason Britain improved its position in the global table since the last index in 2002, Prof Esty said, was the introduction of new measures of sustainability, such as vulnerability to environmental disasters like drought, where the country"s geography and high rainfall makes it look good.
The index was compiled by assigning each country points under 21 different headings, such as air quality, biodiversity, reducing air pollution, environmental health and international collaborative efforts. Britain scored 50.2, compared with 75.1 for Finland, 55.2 for France and 52.9 for the US.
Prof Esty said the US performed worse than many Americans expected but better than most Europeans believed. "The US has a very uneven performance," he said. "They have the best water quality in the world ... but they are on the bottom tier on waste generation and greenhouse gas emissions."
【英國(guó)環(huán)保水平處于歐洲末流的英語(yǔ)美文】相關(guān)文章：
歐洲人力調(diào)查:英國(guó)民眾工作壓力小英語(yǔ)美文08-28
歐洲調(diào)查北歐人最快樂(lè)英語(yǔ)美文08-14
英國(guó)人購(gòu)買(mǎi)圣誕禮物的花費(fèi)居歐洲第一現(xiàn)代英語(yǔ)美文08-15
英國(guó)王儲(chǔ)的蜜月之地英語(yǔ)美文09-17
歲末流年的散文03-11